This seems quite apt after my recent dig at the Frogs!! (http://pauljamesog.blogspot.com/2009/10/complete-military-history-of-france.html)
Saturday, 31 October 2009
French Military Victories
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
11:19 AM
6
comments
Labels: France
Wednesday, 28 October 2009
HMS ROCKET
Another YIAWWS Exclusive - by Vanvlak Industries!
HMS 'Rocket' is the lead ship of the MkII Airborne Steam Shunt (A.S.S.) class of unarmed vessel, a short range flyer used to shuffle cargo around docks. The long rail at the rear is used to attach cargo onto. The MkIIa is similar but has a redesigned aft section and is a dedicated dirigible and aeronef tug, although the MkII itself is sometimes put to the same use. The MkIIb is identical to the MkII but has an enclosed cockpit for space use.
'Rocket' is currently attached to the Mediterranean fleet, and has seen service in Malta and Graham Island.*
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinandea
It's the first model in a new collection of vehicles I intend to build (no bets on whether I'll actually get them done...). They will be a loose assortment of Victoriana, mostly vehicles with some troops, all in 15mm scale. I'm currently working on the second vehicle, a Mk I Conveyancer. The vessels will be part of a joint British (Imperial)/Venetian force. I still have no idea what they are up to in the Mediterranean, or who their enemies would be (Barbary Coast Pirates? The Russian Navy?).
Peter Pig sailor at the helm. 
Bravo old Boy - we've missed your unique style and great skills around here!
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
7:05 AM
4
comments
Labels: Vanvlak Industries
Sunday, 25 October 2009
Attack on Melbourne
Interesting details of a colonial harbour defense plan (minus the aerostats and aquanefs of course!)
http://www.awm.gov.au/journal/j35/kitson.asp

Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
9:14 PM
1 comments
Labels: Aquanef, Ironclad Navies
Tuesday, 20 October 2009
Old School Balkan Dirigibles
Gentlemen,
A Turkish cruiser squadron on patrol, no doubt searching the Greeks or Bulgarians.
Finally the Bulgarians - the large model in the centre has some outrigger launching rails for fixed wing aircraft although sadly I never got around to adding them.
It was great fun making these and I am sure the next lot will be even better.
I hope you enjoy this piece of Aeronef history as much as I did digging them out!
Posted by
David Crook
at
10:18 PM
4
comments
Thursday, 15 October 2009
Zeppelin to America
Posted by
SteelonSand
at
7:10 PM
1 comments
Labels: Aeronef
Tuesday, 13 October 2009
Welcome Captain Shrike!
Another convert to the madness of VSF!
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
9:50 PM
2
comments
Labels: News
Monday, 12 October 2009
The Complete Military History of France
Intriguing facts from a recent lecture at the Imperial War College, delivered by Colonel Rowley Birkin, retired (you may recall him from here: http://pauljamesog.blogspot.com/2006/12/happy-new-year.html)

Gallic Wars - Lost. In a war whose ending foreshadows the next 2000 years of French history, France is conquered by of all things, an Italian.
Hundred Years War - Mostly lost, saved at last moment by schizophrenic teenaged girl, who inadvertently creates The First Rule of French Warfare; "France's armies are victorious only when not led by a Frenchman."
Italian Wars - Lost. France becomes the first and only country to ever lose two wars when fighting Italians.
Wars of Religion - France goes 0-5-4 against the Huguenots.
Thirty Years War - France is technically not a participant, but manages to get invaded anyway. Claims a tie on the basis that eventually the other participants started ignoring her.
War of Devolution - Tied. Frenchmen take to wearing red flowerpots as chapeaux.
The Dutch War - Tied
War of the Augsburg League/King William's War/French and Indian War - Lost, but claimed as a tie. Three ties in a row induces deluded Frogophiles the world over to label the period as the height of French military power.
War of the Spanish Succession - Lost. The War also gave the French their first taste of a Marlborough, which they have loved every since.
American Revolution - In a move that will become quite familiar to future Americans, France claims a win even though the English colonists saw far more action. This is later known as "de Gaulle Syndrome", and leads to the Second Rule of French Warfare; "France only wins when America does most of the fighting."
French Revolution - Won, primarily due the fact that the opponent was also French.
The Napoleonic Wars - Lost. Temporary victories (remember the First Rule!) due to leadership of a Corsican, who ended up being no match for a British footwear designer.
The Franco-Prussian War - Lost. Germany plays the role of drunk Frat boy to France's ugly girl home alone on a Saturday night.
World War I - Tied and on the way to losing, France is saved by the United States (According to them - eh?) Thousands of French women find out what it's like to not only sleep with a winner, but one who doesn't call her "Fraulein." (Yes, indeed lots of colonials served in France as well as giving old Johnny Turk a good fight at gallipolli!) Sadly, widespread use of condoms forestalls any improvement in the French bloodline.
World War II - Lost. Conquered French liberated by the United States and Britain (supported once again by stout colonial chaps!) just as they finish learning the Horst Wessel Song.
War in Indochina - Lost. French forces plead sickness, take to bed with the Dien Bien Flu.
Algerian Rebellion - Lost. Loss marks the first defeat of a western army by a Non-Turkic Muslim force since the Crusades, and produces the First Rule of Muslim Warfare; "We can always beat the French." This rule is identical to the First Rules of the Italians, Russians, Germans, English, Dutch, Spanish, Vietnamese and Esquimaux.
War on Terrorism - France, keeping in mind its recent history, surrenders to Germans and Muslims just to be safe. Attempts to surrender to Vietnamese ambassador fail after he takes refuge in a McDonald's.
The question for any country silly enough to count on the French should not be "Can we count on the French?" but rather "How long until France collapses?"
All in good fun of course Chaps, what ho!
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
9:35 PM
1 comments
Labels: France
Saturday, 10 October 2009
Eli's Land Ironclads
I like the twin turreted beasts with triangular treads in particular - well done Sir!
http://leadpeople.blogspot.com/2008/10/land-ironclads-force-thus-far.html
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
7:53 PM
2
comments
Labels: Land Ironclads
Friday, 9 October 2009
Dreadnought Class Battle Zeppelin

http://www.heavymetal.com/wotw/gallery.html
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
6:51 AM
0
comments
Labels: Artwork
Thursday, 8 October 2009
Ragnarok 56 preview
Issue 56 contains the following:
Allies and Mercenaries In Warhammer 40,000
Fantasy Air Wargaming
Competition: Fantasy Air Wargaming
If Rome Had Not Fallen
Tusk
“Tighten the Line” Scenario
Sub-Loque
Space Vixens: Divine Wind
Space Hrud
The Rules of War - 3rd Edition Space Hulk reviewed
The Melting Pot - Miniature Reviews
http://www.sfsfw.org/rag56.php
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
6:52 AM
0
comments
Labels: SFSFW
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
Confederate Submarines
Davids, Hunleys, Pioneer II, they are all here in the neat little article... with a conspiracy theory thrown in for good measure!
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
6:18 AM
2
comments
Labels: Aquanef, Ironclad Navies
Monday, 5 October 2009
HML Leviathan unveiled
http://monstersinthesky.com/2009/10/02/evolution-of-the-british-leviathan_part-3/#more-245
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
8:20 PM
0
comments
Labels: Artwork, Leviathans
Sunday, 4 October 2009
Colonial Invasion fiction
http://www.cerberus.com.au/dash.pdf
This will make a cracking set of scenarios for Aquanef ....with a few digs and submersibles thrown in of course!
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
3:32 PM
0
comments
Labels: Ironclad Navies
Thursday, 1 October 2009
Ironclad Ramming
"Ram Anything Painted Gray” – Wilhelm von Tegetthoff before the Battle of Lissa(1866)
The Austro-Prussian War (1866) was fought between the Austrian Empire on one side, and Prussia and the Kingdom of Italy on the other side. Prussia sought to gain greater control over Germany, while Italy wanted to take Venetia from the Austrians.. The largest naval engagement occurred near the island of Lissa in the Adriatic Sea. There an Austrian fleet of ironclads and steam powered wooden ships fought a larger Italian fleet. The Austrians caught the Italians unprepared and succeeded in “crossing the T” of the Italian fleet. The heavy side belt armor of the ironclads was invulnerable to gunnery, and the most effect offensive tactic was ramming. The Austrian fleet emerged victorious. In the war, however, Austria was defeated and ceded territory to both Prussian and Italy.
In more modern examples, many 19th Century ironclad battleships were so equipped. The first modern ram ship built was the French-built Taureau, in 1863. In fact, many ironclad ships were designed specifically to ram opponents. In ships of this type, the armour belt was prolonged to brace both sides of the ram to increase structural integrity.

The theory behind the revival of the weapon derived from the fact that, in the period around 1860, armour held superiority over the ship-mounted cannon. That is to say, it was believed that an armoured warship could not be seriously damaged by the naval artillery in existence at the time. In order to achieve a decisive result in a naval engagement, therefore, alternative methods of action were believed to be necessary. As it followed, from the same belief, that a ship armed with a ram could not be seriously damaged by the gunfire of its intended victim, the ram became, for a brief period, the main armament of Royal Navy and contemporary foreign battleships.
The frequent use of ramming as a tactic in the Battle of Lissa (1866) also led to many late nineteenth century naval designers equipping their warships with ram bows. This only really aggravated a number of incidents of ships being sunk by their squadron-mates in accidental collisions as ramming never featured as a viable battle tactic again. The fixation on ramming may also have inhibited the development of gunnery.
When it became clear, towards the end of the nineteenth century, that breech-loading cannon could hit, and hit effectively, enemy ships at several thousand yards range, the ineffectiveness of the ram became clear and ships ceased to be fitted with them.
No other ironclad was ever sunk by an enemy ship in time of war by the use of the ram, although the ram was regarded by all major navies for some thirty years as primary battleship armament. A number of ships were, however, rammed in peacetime by ships of their own navy. The most serious in terms of loss of life was the collision between HMS Victoria and HMS Camperdown,[Tas's note - a young John Jellicoe, the RN Fleet Commander at the Battle of Jutland, narrowly escaped death in this incident] which took place in the Mediterranean in 1893. The only battleship over submarine victory in history occurred during World War I, when the battleship HMS Dreadnought rammed and sank a German U-Boat, but this was incidental, and Dreadnought’s bow was not intended for ramming enemy vessels.
http://warandgame.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/ironclad-ram-doctrine/
Posted by
Paul of the Man Cave
at
6:54 AM
3
comments
Labels: Ironclad Navies





