http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2366435/Pictures-military-science-1913-America-feared-deadly-bomb-showers-battle-begun.html
Monday, 22 September 2014
The first real Aeronef
An interesting article regarding pre WW1 commentary on the impacts of technology, including airships. Very reminiscent of HG Wells in War in the Air
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2366435/Pictures-military-science-1913-America-feared-deadly-bomb-showers-battle-begun.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2366435/Pictures-military-science-1913-America-feared-deadly-bomb-showers-battle-begun.html
Tuesday, 16 September 2014
War Plan Red: Part 4
The US Plan to defeat Great Britain, based on their assessment of the likely British plan to blockade the Atlantic and invade through New England to threaten the vital industrial heartland of the US (for more detail see here).
Having assessed the likely British plan, US planners broadly concluded that:
Having assessed the likely British plan, US planners broadly concluded that:
- Naval situation in the Atlantic would at best be a standoff with neither side having no significant advantage, OR the British would sabotage the Panama Canal and gain a decisive advantage
- British efforts to lodge an invasion force would likely be staged using Canada as a forward operating base
- British Cruiser and submarine forces operating out of Canada and the Caribbean would be sufficient to blockade the majority of merchant traffic, and
- British threats to the North East of the US would likely be effective before the American industrial and manpower superiority could be mobilised.
 |
| Allied convoy assembles in Halifax: Exactly what the US planners wanted to prevent |
In consideration of these factors, the US planners concluded that the answer to defeat Great Britain was to immediately go on the offensive and remove the British ability to utilise Canada and other forward operating bases, by seizing “Red bases in the western North Atlantic, the West Indies, and the Caribbean.” The strategic priority was Halifax, Nova Scotia and its all important naval base which would be critical in supporting a forward deployed Royal Navy operating on the East Coast of the US. The US estimated it had a maximum of 14 days before the combined RN Home and Mediterranean Fleets would be operating on their doorstep. Use of this time would be critical.
The US Army had only limited initial resources but those available would strike north rapidly. Within 3 days of mobilisation, a Corps of 3 Divisions (some 25,000 troops) would muster at Boston. Depending on the situation, they could move north through Maine using the rail network to enhance their mobility, or proceed north under fleet escort to conduct an amphibious attack on Halifax. In considering the lessons of WW1, US submarine warfare would also be waged to interdict Canada from British shipping and deny the buildup of the forces required to undertake an invasion of the US and deploy accordingly.
The US Army had only limited initial resources but those available would strike north rapidly. Within 3 days of mobilisation, a Corps of 3 Divisions (some 25,000 troops) would muster at Boston. Depending on the situation, they could move north through Maine using the rail network to enhance their mobility, or proceed north under fleet escort to conduct an amphibious attack on Halifax. In considering the lessons of WW1, US submarine warfare would also be waged to interdict Canada from British shipping and deny the buildup of the forces required to undertake an invasion of the US and deploy accordingly.
 |
| The best defence... |
This track would also be supported by spoiling attacks along the eastern boarder. As troops became available, an advance would be made from upstate New York against Montreal and Quebec while another force would advance to take the hydro-electric plants on the Niagara River. Other moves would be made to safeguard the Detroit industrial region and capture other key infrastructure such as the Sault St marine canal and its locks. The occupation of Canadian territory was a priority, weather and logistic wallowing. Realistically, in these early stage there would be little that Canada could do without British reinforcement, though aggressive aerial attacks were expected with little that could be done to prevent them.
Back at Sea, the short period before the Royal Navy appearing in strength was critical. The US Atlantic fleet (4 Battleships plus cruiser support) would be used to strike British possessions. Initial targets were Jamaica, the Bahamas and Bermuda, to be followed up if possible with attacks on Trinidad, St Lucia and British possessions in the West Indies. These would reduce the use of these bases to interdict merchant traffic and help safeguard the Panama Canal. On the great lakes and in the pacific Canadian ports would be blockaded.
With the British ability to invade the East Coast significantly degraded, the US Army would focus on dislocating the Canadian Eats and West coasts to prevent a buildup of Indian or ANZAC troops from the Pacific coast. Capture of the Winnipeg rail centre, a crucial rail node, was key in this, followed by the occupation of Vancouver and British Columbia.
Overall, the US plan was to strike quickly to remove Canada as a staging point, prevent a British buildup and allow US mobilisation efforts to come to fruition. As unlikely as the situation was deemed, it was deemed to be a valid strategy.
Should Japan enter the War on the British side, a join War Plan Red-Orange would be activated (War Plan Orange being the contingency plan for war against Japan). British Naval strength was seen to be the biggest threat and the intent was to prosecute a "Red First" policy, analogously prescient to the 'Europe First' policy of WW2.
One point to consider - War Plan Red was developed in 1927 after the Geneva Naval Conference of that year, and was approved in 1930. Transplant this scenario to a VSF setting and a few different aspects come into play. The demilitarisation of the US-Canadian boarder, key to the US twentieth century plan, started in the late 1870s. Residual infrastructure could still be present and even be reactivated in a period of tension. Use of such facilities for aeronef raids into the US might degrade or delay the initial thrust into Halifax. Alternatively, an RN aquanef blockade could be established off the East Coast prior to hostilities, nullifying the initial US freedom of acton. Lots of possibilities.
Alternatively, if it appeals to you as is then there is a board game from Avalanche Press you may wish to investigate (thanks Michael P, for the information).
Back at Sea, the short period before the Royal Navy appearing in strength was critical. The US Atlantic fleet (4 Battleships plus cruiser support) would be used to strike British possessions. Initial targets were Jamaica, the Bahamas and Bermuda, to be followed up if possible with attacks on Trinidad, St Lucia and British possessions in the West Indies. These would reduce the use of these bases to interdict merchant traffic and help safeguard the Panama Canal. On the great lakes and in the pacific Canadian ports would be blockaded.
Overall, the US plan was to strike quickly to remove Canada as a staging point, prevent a British buildup and allow US mobilisation efforts to come to fruition. As unlikely as the situation was deemed, it was deemed to be a valid strategy.
Should Japan enter the War on the British side, a join War Plan Red-Orange would be activated (War Plan Orange being the contingency plan for war against Japan). British Naval strength was seen to be the biggest threat and the intent was to prosecute a "Red First" policy, analogously prescient to the 'Europe First' policy of WW2.
One point to consider - War Plan Red was developed in 1927 after the Geneva Naval Conference of that year, and was approved in 1930. Transplant this scenario to a VSF setting and a few different aspects come into play. The demilitarisation of the US-Canadian boarder, key to the US twentieth century plan, started in the late 1870s. Residual infrastructure could still be present and even be reactivated in a period of tension. Use of such facilities for aeronef raids into the US might degrade or delay the initial thrust into Halifax. Alternatively, an RN aquanef blockade could be established off the East Coast prior to hostilities, nullifying the initial US freedom of acton. Lots of possibilities.
Alternatively, if it appeals to you as is then there is a board game from Avalanche Press you may wish to investigate (thanks Michael P, for the information).
Thursday, 11 September 2014
War Plan Red: Part 3
The British Plan
...or at least, the US planners' assessment of the likely British plan...
The War in the Atlantic
This was assessed to be the dominant, but not only, theatre of maritime operations. The RN would initially seize control of the North Atlantic by combining their Home and Mediterranean Fleets and operating from a forward base at Bermuda. British cruiser and submarine forces would try to cut US Atlantic lines of communications from bases in Halifax and Jamaica. The Royal Navy would blockade the East Coast of the US, disrupt commerce, harass coastal areas with bombardment, and conduct Air and Amphibious raids to further degrade the economy and, ultimately, popular will of the US people for the war.
The British would expect the US to immediately redeploy the bulk of their Pacific Feet to the Atlantic via the Panama canal, and generate a Fleet in being with which to contest this blockade. If this was achieved, no decisive engagement would be sought initially as both sides were well balanced and the result could go either way.
Accordingly, the US Navy would remain in a defensive posture concentrated in the Western North Atlantic, threaten British lines of communication, wear down Royal Naval strength and await favourable opportunity for Fleet Action. Of course, if the Panama Canal could be disrupted or sabotaged, this would be a different story...
The War in the Pacific
The British Asiatic Fleet would be concentrated at Singapore with only light, inshore forces remaining at Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand. Indian troops would muster and link up wight he Fleet before for assaulting the Philippines to neutralise the US naval facilities holdings in Manilla. This would safeguard threats to British trade and commercial interests and subsequently, the Asiatic Fleet would be utilised to destroy any residual US Naval island holdings throughout the Pacific.
With the bulk of Empire assets investing the US East Coast, Hawaii was expected to remain a safe bastion and while it might be attacked to disrupt and commerce raiders operating from there, no invasion or landing was expected.
Alaska was expected to be raided from Canada, but only lightly and this was seen as acceptable.
...or at least, the US planners' assessment of the likely British plan...
The War in the Atlantic
This was assessed to be the dominant, but not only, theatre of maritime operations. The RN would initially seize control of the North Atlantic by combining their Home and Mediterranean Fleets and operating from a forward base at Bermuda. British cruiser and submarine forces would try to cut US Atlantic lines of communications from bases in Halifax and Jamaica. The Royal Navy would blockade the East Coast of the US, disrupt commerce, harass coastal areas with bombardment, and conduct Air and Amphibious raids to further degrade the economy and, ultimately, popular will of the US people for the war.
The British would expect the US to immediately redeploy the bulk of their Pacific Feet to the Atlantic via the Panama canal, and generate a Fleet in being with which to contest this blockade. If this was achieved, no decisive engagement would be sought initially as both sides were well balanced and the result could go either way.
Accordingly, the US Navy would remain in a defensive posture concentrated in the Western North Atlantic, threaten British lines of communication, wear down Royal Naval strength and await favourable opportunity for Fleet Action. Of course, if the Panama Canal could be disrupted or sabotaged, this would be a different story...
 |
| Panama Cana - a vital Strategic link |
The British Asiatic Fleet would be concentrated at Singapore with only light, inshore forces remaining at Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand. Indian troops would muster and link up wight he Fleet before for assaulting the Philippines to neutralise the US naval facilities holdings in Manilla. This would safeguard threats to British trade and commercial interests and subsequently, the Asiatic Fleet would be utilised to destroy any residual US Naval island holdings throughout the Pacific.
With the bulk of Empire assets investing the US East Coast, Hawaii was expected to remain a safe bastion and while it might be attacked to disrupt and commerce raiders operating from there, no invasion or landing was expected.
Alaska was expected to be raided from Canada, but only lightly and this was seen as acceptable.
 |
| Landings by ANZAC and Indian troops on the West Coast of the US where seen as acceptable risks |
The Land War
The pivotal US territory was seen to be the industrial North East region of continental US. Possible landings by ANZAC and Indian focus on the West Coast or striking south from Canada could and would be tolerated in order to maintain a strong defensive perimeter to safeguard the industrial heartland of the USA.
Should the Royal Navy manage to defeat the US Atlantic Fleet and establish sea control (either though battle or should the Panama Canal be disputed and the Pacific Fleet trapped) it was expected that invasion would come via sea with amphibious landings in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. These forces would then strike westward through Connecticut, disrupt the region generally and threaten New York. This would greatly shorten the period of conflict and try to overcome the US mobilisation effort while also degrading industrial capacity.
War planners concluded that the British Empire could achieve this outcome, the US choice would be reduced to what kind of terms to ask for in their surrender...
The pivotal US territory was seen to be the industrial North East region of continental US. Possible landings by ANZAC and Indian focus on the West Coast or striking south from Canada could and would be tolerated in order to maintain a strong defensive perimeter to safeguard the industrial heartland of the USA.
Should the Royal Navy manage to defeat the US Atlantic Fleet and establish sea control (either though battle or should the Panama Canal be disputed and the Pacific Fleet trapped) it was expected that invasion would come via sea with amphibious landings in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. These forces would then strike westward through Connecticut, disrupt the region generally and threaten New York. This would greatly shorten the period of conflict and try to overcome the US mobilisation effort while also degrading industrial capacity.
War planners concluded that the British Empire could achieve this outcome, the US choice would be reduced to what kind of terms to ask for in their surrender...
Thursday, 4 September 2014
War Plan Red: Part 2
Having discovered the 1920/30s era US Military plans to engage in hostilities with the British Empire (here), I had to delve deeper. Admittedly, neither side considered such a war remotely probable, but it was certainly not impossible should issues regarding international trade route and overseas territories come to a head.
Archives were searched, journals read and the odd book discovered. For the discerning strategist, the following detail is provided. Note that the UK never committed such plan to paper, but some good guesswork assessed their likely operations.
Pre Conflict Comparison
The Royal Navy had slightly more naval power, with the main battle line spread between the Home Fleet and the Mediterranean. It would be able to rapidly concentrate and venture across the Atlantic to have significant presence at Nova Scotia within 13 days. In comparison, the bulk of the US Navy battlewagons were in the Pacific and the timely use of the Panama Canal was critical in being able to face off against the British fleet in the Atlantic.
Royal Navy US Navy
Battleships 16 18 (12 in the Pacific)
Battlecruisers 4 0
Aircraft Carriers 6 3 (larger capacity than RN equivalents, all in the Pacific)
Cruisers 62 18
Destroyers 175 221
Submarines 57 68
Air Force strength was significantly in favour of the British, though redeploying it to Canada would take significant sea lift capacity. The British could muster such lift capacity but it would have to be balanced with other priorities, such as ground forces.
RAF US
Fighter Squadrons 12 3 Pursuit, 2 Attack
Observer Squadrons 5 9
Bomber Squadrons 11 2
Manpower wise, the British Army could rapidly mobilise more soldiers from across their dominions than the US, but the US could build a greater land force over time.
British Empire
Regular Forces 100,000 man Expeditionary Force (4 Divisions, 2 Cavalry Brigades)
Deployable to Nova Scotia within 30 days
Overseas Forces Canada: 52,000 (increasing to 120,000 in 11 Divisions in 30 Days)
India and ANZAC forces: 13 Divisions available at short notice
Territorial Army 13 Divisions available within 6 months
US
Regular Forces 100,000 men at home,
9 Divisions
Overseas Forces 40,000 in Panama, Philippines, Puerto Rico and Hawaii
National Guard 175, 000 (60 days to mobilise)
18 Divisions (understrength), 9 Cavalry Brigades
More to Follow...
Archives were searched, journals read and the odd book discovered. For the discerning strategist, the following detail is provided. Note that the UK never committed such plan to paper, but some good guesswork assessed their likely operations.
Pre Conflict Comparison
The Royal Navy had slightly more naval power, with the main battle line spread between the Home Fleet and the Mediterranean. It would be able to rapidly concentrate and venture across the Atlantic to have significant presence at Nova Scotia within 13 days. In comparison, the bulk of the US Navy battlewagons were in the Pacific and the timely use of the Panama Canal was critical in being able to face off against the British fleet in the Atlantic.
Royal Navy US Navy
Battleships 16 18 (12 in the Pacific)
Battlecruisers 4 0
Aircraft Carriers 6 3 (larger capacity than RN equivalents, all in the Pacific)
Cruisers 62 18
Destroyers 175 221
Submarines 57 68
Air Force strength was significantly in favour of the British, though redeploying it to Canada would take significant sea lift capacity. The British could muster such lift capacity but it would have to be balanced with other priorities, such as ground forces.
RAF US
Fighter Squadrons 12 3 Pursuit, 2 Attack
Observer Squadrons 5 9
Bomber Squadrons 11 2
Manpower wise, the British Army could rapidly mobilise more soldiers from across their dominions than the US, but the US could build a greater land force over time.
British Empire
Regular Forces 100,000 man Expeditionary Force (4 Divisions, 2 Cavalry Brigades)
Deployable to Nova Scotia within 30 days
Overseas Forces Canada: 52,000 (increasing to 120,000 in 11 Divisions in 30 Days)
India and ANZAC forces: 13 Divisions available at short notice
Territorial Army 13 Divisions available within 6 months
Regular Forces 100,000 men at home,
9 Divisions
Overseas Forces 40,000 in Panama, Philippines, Puerto Rico and Hawaii
National Guard 175, 000 (60 days to mobilise)
18 Divisions (understrength), 9 Cavalry Brigades
More to Follow...
Tuesday, 26 August 2014
Imperial Germany's Invasion plans for New York
Apparently, this increasingly ambitious series of late 19th Century plans included dispatching a significant fleet to cross the Atlantic, conducting a decisive engagement in the vicinity of Norfolk Virgina, dashing north to shell Boston, and then sending battalions of Prussian chaps ashore in New York to install panic and plunder the city.
Cheeky Blighter!
Not sure how successful that might have been but there has to be some games in that!
http://europeanhistory.about.com/library/weekly/aa050902a.htm
http://www.americanheritage.com/content/german-plan-invade-america
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/may/09/kateconnolly
http://en.potiori.com/Imperial_German_plans_for_the_invasion_of_the_United_States.html
http://io9.com/the-secret-german-scheme-to-invade-america-before-the-f-1628063060
Saturday, 23 August 2014
War Plan Red
In doing some research into the US War Plan Orange this week, I stumbled across some other interesting plans developed in the aftermath of WW1, mostly to exercise War Planning and Strategic staffs learning, but also useful as the basis for contingencies.
Of striking interest to me was the US War Plan Red, which was to fight a war against England, and potentially Japan also as per the provisions of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. War Plan Red had a number of subset plans, notably War Plan Scarlet against Australian, New Zealand and Commonwealth interests in the Pacific, and War Plan Crimson against Canada. Interestingly, War Plan Red had the US assume a strategically defensive posture against what they saw would be a mostly Atlantic affair and prepare for a landing of British Troops on the east coast of the Continental USA. At the same time, the planner saw that a invasion of British interests in Canada and the Caribbean would be the best way to reduce British interests on the continent.
All very interesting, particularly when one then lays on top of that the Canadian Defence Scheme Number 1 which was for a counter invasion of the US to stall for time and allow British support to cross the Atlantic. The Canadian plan saw flying columns seizing territory along the Pacific and Atlantic US coasts. An audacious plan indeed but one that was seen as sufficiently desperate it might just succeed if the dice rolled correctly.
And so were laid the plans of what might have been, but more interesting is to consider them being executed in the 1890s...with a few VSF elements thrown in...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Plan_Red
http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/britains-pacific-war-against-the-united-states-in-the-age-of-the-anglo-american-special-relationship/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Scheme_No._1
http://www.glasnost.de/hist/usa/1935invasion.html
Of striking interest to me was the US War Plan Red, which was to fight a war against England, and potentially Japan also as per the provisions of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. War Plan Red had a number of subset plans, notably War Plan Scarlet against Australian, New Zealand and Commonwealth interests in the Pacific, and War Plan Crimson against Canada. Interestingly, War Plan Red had the US assume a strategically defensive posture against what they saw would be a mostly Atlantic affair and prepare for a landing of British Troops on the east coast of the Continental USA. At the same time, the planner saw that a invasion of British interests in Canada and the Caribbean would be the best way to reduce British interests on the continent.
All very interesting, particularly when one then lays on top of that the Canadian Defence Scheme Number 1 which was for a counter invasion of the US to stall for time and allow British support to cross the Atlantic. The Canadian plan saw flying columns seizing territory along the Pacific and Atlantic US coasts. An audacious plan indeed but one that was seen as sufficiently desperate it might just succeed if the dice rolled correctly.
And so were laid the plans of what might have been, but more interesting is to consider them being executed in the 1890s...with a few VSF elements thrown in...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Plan_Red
http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/britains-pacific-war-against-the-united-states-in-the-age-of-the-anglo-american-special-relationship/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Scheme_No._1
http://www.glasnost.de/hist/usa/1935invasion.html
Tuesday, 19 August 2014
Tsushima
Scenes from a Japanese film "Clouds on the Hill", which I have been unable to get a copy of so far. Some good imagery in these clips, particularly the low freeboard on the capital ships.
There is also a great (and unfortunately hard to find) Japanese film "Battle of the Japan Sea" made in 1969. The first few minutes are available on YouTube.
One of the more interesting written accounts of the whole battle that I have read is "The Fleet that had to Die" by Richard Hough. Originally written by a Russian only a year or so after the battle, it has some very interesting perspectives regarding the Baltic Fleet and its epic journey from Russia to Tsushima and its subsequent destruction. Well worth tracking a copy down.
And if you ever find yourself in Japan near Tokyo, you must go to the outlying city of Yokosuka and go onboard Admiral Togo's Flagship: the Battleship Mikasa. I had the privilege in 1995 and it was fantastic.
There is also a great (and unfortunately hard to find) Japanese film "Battle of the Japan Sea" made in 1969. The first few minutes are available on YouTube.
One of the more interesting written accounts of the whole battle that I have read is "The Fleet that had to Die" by Richard Hough. Originally written by a Russian only a year or so after the battle, it has some very interesting perspectives regarding the Baltic Fleet and its epic journey from Russia to Tsushima and its subsequent destruction. Well worth tracking a copy down.
And if you ever find yourself in Japan near Tokyo, you must go to the outlying city of Yokosuka and go onboard Admiral Togo's Flagship: the Battleship Mikasa. I had the privilege in 1995 and it was fantastic.
Friday, 15 August 2014
Maine Maritime Museum
The Maine Maritime Museum in Bath is mainly focused on the old wooden schooners built there in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries. However like the great Museum in Paris (see here), there are some lovely warship models and these caught my eye during my visit last week:
USS Katahdin
Built in 1893, she was an innovative ironclad ram designed for inner harbour defence. Armament was four 6pdrs but the maim weapon was the ram. Rendered rapidly obsolete she was decommissioned and sunk as a target vessel in 1909.
USS Machias
Built in 1893 this was a schooner rigged gunboat. Her main armament was eight 4 inch guns, backed up by four 6 pdrs and four 1 pdrs. She had three separate commissions and ranged far and wide before being sold to the Mexican Navy in 1920.
USS Katahdin
Built in 1893, she was an innovative ironclad ram designed for inner harbour defence. Armament was four 6pdrs but the maim weapon was the ram. Rendered rapidly obsolete she was decommissioned and sunk as a target vessel in 1909.
.jpg) |
| pic from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Katahdin_(1893) |
Built in 1893 this was a schooner rigged gunboat. Her main armament was eight 4 inch guns, backed up by four 6 pdrs and four 1 pdrs. She had three separate commissions and ranged far and wide before being sold to the Mexican Navy in 1920.
 |
| pic from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Machias_(PG-5) |
USS Dahlgren
Coastal Torpedo Boat built in 1900 she was fitted with four 1 pdrs and 2 torpedo tubes
 |
| Pic from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Dahlgren_(TB-9) |
Wednesday, 13 August 2014
Awesome Aeronef scale terrain
I was visiting the Boston City Hall this week and received a brief from the town planners. In their office they had this fantastic model of the downtown area. Superbly detailed and yes its in 1:1200 scale just like the Aeronef model range! I can also see it with Tripods marching their way downtown sweeping all before them with their heat rays...
Tuesday, 5 August 2014
Review of Ragnarok 60
SFSFW have released issue 60 of their journal Ragnarok.
This issue has some great articles and among my favourites are: an Aeronef Campaign set in the Dark Continent, a scenario for Land Ironclads set during the British invasion of France, a variant for Zombies!!! that pits one against a horde of Triffids, and an article regarding gaming in a Battlestar Galactica setting.
Issue 60 continues the new format started in #59 and the editor (Steve Blease of Wessex Games fame) has done a great job with it. Its clear, crisp and easy to read with lots of nice colour pics throughout.
Highly Recommended - get your copy from Wargame Vault, or you can join SFSFW here:
2025 Edit: This still remains the last issue of Ragnarok sadly
Saturday, 2 August 2014
Reviewed in a White Wine Sauce
If you are a follower of the Steampunk Miniatures Review blog, you may have seen last week that I have joined a growing team of contributors there. I'm looking forward to writing a few bits and bobs as I get to them.
Of course, if you aren't a follower of the Steampunk Miniature Review, you're probably wondering what the heck it is! Well its pretty much exactly as the title promises: reviews of a range of steampunk miniatures in a variety of scales and styles. Click on the link and check it out.
Of course, if you aren't a follower of the Steampunk Miniature Review, you're probably wondering what the heck it is! Well its pretty much exactly as the title promises: reviews of a range of steampunk miniatures in a variety of scales and styles. Click on the link and check it out.
 |
| http://steampunkminiaturesreview.blogspot.com |
Monday, 28 July 2014
Blown Away
If you haven't seen it yet, pop over to Brigade Model's blog and look at the report of the weekend's Aeronef gaming - some rather fetching looking aerial warships in action! You'll also see the new 2mm fortifications in play.
http://www.brigademodels.co.uk/Blog/2014/07/blown-away/
http://www.brigademodels.co.uk/Blog/2014/07/blown-away/
 |
| Pic from Brigade Models blog at the link above |
Thursday, 24 July 2014
Thoughts on Sleeping Dragon, Rising Sun (IHMN)
I particularly like the Royal Navy Landing Party which is a very different take to my own Armoured Naval Landing Parties (which one may find at this blog). Mine were designed to be heavily armed parties landed from capital ships, while these ones are more ad-hoc gunboats crews at the ready to storm ashore.
On the down side, I think the addition of some colour artwork and pics of new figs would help fire the imagination but this was clearly a deliberate decision to maximise the written content (as seen here). However, you certainly can't complain about the amount of great written content that was packed in instead.
[EDIT: Author Craig Cartmell has subsequently advised me that they didn't have any choice about the artwork, so I think they made the best of it by adding more written content instead]
Overall, if you are into IHMN this is a must get addition to your collection.
Friday, 18 July 2014
The Queen's Martian Rifles
The Queen's Martian Rifles are an Infantry Battalion based on Mars and defend the British quarter of the European Conclave in the Martian Capital. Along with contingents from the Royal and French Navies, and some foreign chaps from La Legion Etrangere, they protect the trading outpost that the Earthmen have with the technologically backward Martians. But life is a dull on the Red Planet where nothing much ever happens- until the High Priests start getting Johnny Martian all excited and upset that is!
I really enjoyed this book, which is very much in the Space 1889 genre. I won't give anything away but there are some scenes in it which are gratifyingly reminiscent of some of the classic movies I know appeal to many readers of this blog. Its got a few overly religious undertones but they don't detract badly, and neither do the numerous typesetting issues along the way (it looks like a low budget, style production).
Overall, a most enjoyable and recommended yard that will have to reaching for your Space 1889 books with glee.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1491289449/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Wednesday, 16 July 2014
Steampunk Soldiers
Just found this upcoming title on pre-order on Amazon.
Looks like it might be worth the wait until November, just in time for one's Christmas stocking!
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Steampunk-Soldiers-Osprey-Philip-Smith/dp/1472807022
Looks like it might be worth the wait until November, just in time for one's Christmas stocking!
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Steampunk-Soldiers-Osprey-Philip-Smith/dp/1472807022
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
An exploration of debauchery, vice and other reasons to be a man!
